[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Completions in Semantic
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Completions in Semantic |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:55:49 +0900 |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> On a more general note, this is one of the drawbacks to the approach
> taken in semantic/complete.el, i.e. trying to reimplement completion.
> We've painstakingly ironed out a lot of bugs in the standard Emacs
> completion code, and it makes no sense to redo all that for Semantic
> unless there's a good reason. (Not to mention inconsistency issues).
Yes, and it won't properly respect user customizations of the completion
stuff.
[I've often felt that semantic was acting "weird" during completion, but
it's hard to pin down exactly what the problem is (by the time I realize
that it is, I often can't reproduce the offending key sequence).]
-Miles
--
Vote, v. The instrument and symbol of a freeman's power to make a fool of
himself and a wreck of his country.
- Completions in Semantic, Chong Yidong, 2009/10/18
- Re: Completions in Semantic,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/10/18
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Lennart Borgman, 2009/10/19
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Toby Cubitt, 2009/10/30
- Re: Completions in Semantic, Lennart Borgman, 2009/10/30