[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bzr repository ready?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: bzr repository ready? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:17:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> I can think of only 3 useful starting points:
> 1- lightweight checkout: for people who only want to fetch the latest
> code but will never need/want the diff/log or contribute code.
> 2- bound branch (aka heavyweight checkout): for people who are happy
> with CVS and will never want to create a local branch.
> 3- a local mirror-branch + a local dev branch.
This sounds as if one have to make a long-term decission.
Going from 2 to 3 and vice-versa requires less than a minute. You can
mix both workflows without problem. So don't worry too much. Start with
2 and, if you feel in the mood, upgrade to 3.
--
Óscar
- Re: bzr repository ready?, (continued)
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Glenn Morris, 2009/11/21
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/11/22
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/11/22
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/22
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Óscar Fuentes, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Andreas Schwab, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/23
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/24
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/11/25
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/25
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Karl Fogel, 2009/11/25
- Re: bzr repository ready?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/25