[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mail mode vs message mode
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Mail mode vs message mode |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:49:27 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Katsumi Yamaoka <address@hidden> writes:
> It will be something like:
>
> (defcustom message-yank-prefix
> (if (featurep 'xemacs)
> "> "
> (if (or (string-match "\\`23\\.1\\.5[0-9]\\.[0-9]*\\'" emacs-version)
> (>= emacs-major-version 24)
> (and (= emacs-major-version 23) (>= emacs-minor-version 2)))
> mail-yank-prefix
> "> "))
> "doc string")
>
> But I don't find a meaningful difference in it from:
>
> (defcustom message-yank-prefix "> "
> "doc string")
>
> In other words, I'd prefer to revert the recent changes in message.el.
How about not synching message.el automatically?
If message-mode is to become the default mail mode for Emacs, we need to
be able to make changes to it as part of Emacs. If that can't be done,
I'd prefer to switch back to mail-mode.
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, (continued)
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/24
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Miles Bader, 2009/11/25
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/28
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/27
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/27
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/28
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/11/29
- Re: Mail mode vs message mode, Reiner Steib, 2009/11/22