Re: Strange message from "bzr pull"

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:13:33 +0100
> Cc: Karl Fogel <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 19:10, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > It sounds a pity to have a tree that is never used in any way.  It
> > just wastes disk space.
> 
> But on the proposed workflow, the tree *is* used. To merge the changes
> from the task branches, and to commit upstream.

I don't know enough about bzr internals, but I was under the
impression that the tree-less repository has all the information
needed for that, albeit not in the form of the Emacs source files.
Otherwise, how could you "bzr branch" from the trunk acting as local
repository?