[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:14:24 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:08:13 -0800
>
> > Drew, does the problem in #5299 go away for you if you set
> > send-mail-function to mailclient-send-it?
>
> Nope (just tried it).
How did it fail? What happened?
> As Lennart and I have said, there was some Windows-specific code that did
> this:
>
> . When you hit C-c C-c, it popped up the mail client (in my case, Outlook)
> with
> a new message window.
>
> . The message was pre-address to the right bug list (pretest or bugs). It had
> the Subject filled out.
>
> . But the message body did not have the body that you entered in Emacs.
> Instead,
> it had this text (still does, for Emacs 22):
>
> *** E-Mail body has been placed on clipboard, please paste them here! ***
>
> All you had to do then was use `C-v' to paste the body you wrote in place of
> that "***...***" text.
That's what mailclient-send-it is supposed to do, AFAIK.
- custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, David Reitter, 2010/02/22
- Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Glenn Morris, 2010/02/23
- RE: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Drew Adams, 2010/02/23
- Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Reiner Steib, 2010/02/24
- RE: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Drew Adams, 2010/02/24
- Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/24
- RE: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Drew Adams, 2010/02/25
- Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/26
- RE: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Drew Adams, 2010/02/26
- Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/26