emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: abbrev-mode and with-wrapper-hook on Windows


From: zwz
Subject: Re: abbrev-mode and with-wrapper-hook on Windows
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:01:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

zwz <zhangweize <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> I just found a weird problem about the abbrev-mode on Windows. After I 
enable 
> abbrev-mode, I cannot enter any characters but digits and letters, saying 
> that "expand-abbrev: Invalid function: with-wrapper-hook". This problem does 
> not happen on Linux. 
> 
> I googled and found some answers, like "make bootstrap". But in fact, this 
> does not work on Windows, since I did compile the latest GNU emacs by "make 
> bootstrap" with MSYS+MinGW.

Here "latest" just means "GNU Emacs 23.1.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6002)" :)
I pulled the *latest* one from bzr repository, and found it could not pass 
the "make bootstrap":
(after a list of very long compilation outputs)
oo-spd/i386/ctags.o:ctags.c:(.text+0x156e): undefined reference to 
`_imp__re_set_syntax'
oo-spd/i386/ctags.o:ctags.c:(.text+0x1592): undefined reference to 
`_imp__re_compile_pattern'
oo-spd/i386/ctags.o:ctags.c:(.text+0x162b): undefined reference to 
`_imp__re_set_syntax'
oo-spd/i386/ctags.o:ctags.c:(.text+0x1ded): undefined reference to 
`_imp__re_match'
oo-spd/i386/ctags.o:ctags.c:(.text+0x6ff0): undefined reference to 
`_imp__re_search'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Has anyone got a solution?

> 
> And I tried:
> 1. eval the function "expand-abbrev" (in abbrev.el) by C-x C-e; then the 
error 
> message chaged as "with-wrapper-hook: Symbol's function definition is void: 
> labels". In a new-started emacs, however, I can see that the 
function "labels" 
> is defined in cl-macs.el. I have no idea what else happened when I hit C-x C-
e.
> 
> 2. add (load "abbrev") in ~/.emacs; this solves the problem. Now I can use 
> abbrev-mode, but I do not like this workaround. I hope somebody can help me 
> figure out why and how.
> 
> 








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]