[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my! |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:54:39 -0400 |
Sure, Schemers ought to be encouraged to write
"(null? x)" rather than "(eq? x '())" but ...
what about "(eq? x y)"?
My original plan was to have two execution modes,
a Lisp mode in which () and Scheme's false object are equal,
and a Scheme mode in which they were not equal.
I had a plan for nil too, but I don't remember what it was.
And: since Emacs lisp and Guile can't agree about
equality (whichever flavor) - how do I write a
hash table library useful to both environments?
It should hash all the kinds of nil the same.
Then, as regards the comparison, it can depend on
the execution mode as inherited from the caller.
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, (continued)
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/22
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Andy Wingo, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Andy Wingo, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Andy Wingo, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/23
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Andy Wingo, 2010/04/24
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/24
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: guile and emacs and elisp, oh my!, Andy Wingo, 2010/04/25