[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frame ordering
From: |
David Reitter |
Subject: |
Re: Frame ordering |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:16:34 -0400 |
On Jun 12, 2010, at 4:01 AM, martin rudalics wrote:
> > `handle-switch-frame' could be defined in Lisp anyway, calling the current
> > Fhandle_switch_frame primitive.
>
> I don't think so. IIUC it's purpose is to hide do_switch_frame from
> Elisp.
Either way, it might not be the right solution.
When selecting a frame from the Buffer menu, the switch-frame event doesn't
seem to be generated.
Of course, this could be fixed manually, but what happens when `select-frame'
is used (e.g., M-x other-frame)?
At the same time, we definitely want to avoid reordering due to temporary
selection of a frame in code (e.g., `with-selected-frame').
Should Vframe_list not be updated in the event loop?
- Frame ordering, David Reitter, 2010/06/11
- Re: Frame ordering, martin rudalics, 2010/06/11
- Re: Frame ordering, David Reitter, 2010/06/11
- Re: Frame ordering, martin rudalics, 2010/06/11
- Re: Frame ordering, David Reitter, 2010/06/12
- Re: Frame ordering, martin rudalics, 2010/06/12
- Re: Frame ordering,
David Reitter <=
- Re: Frame ordering, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/13
- Re: Frame ordering, David Reitter, 2010/06/13
- Re: Frame ordering, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/06/13
- Re: Frame ordering, martin rudalics, 2010/06/14
- Re: Frame ordering, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/14
- Re: Frame ordering, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/06/14
- Re: Frame ordering, martin rudalics, 2010/06/14
- Re: Frame ordering, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/06/14
- Re: Frame ordering, martin rudalics, 2010/06/14
- Re: Frame ordering, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/06/14