Re: save-excursion again

[Stefan Monnier]

> I don't see how this process is supposed to terminate if users find
> counterexamples.  Presumably the original code is then reinstated, and
> the whole procedure starts from the beginning.

No, when we find a bug we replace the code with something *else*.
Typically we replace (with-current-buffer B ...) by
(with-current-buffer B (save-excursion ...)), or is some other case we
have to replace it with (save-excursion B (with-current-buffer ...)).

> It would not appear that there is a way to _intentionally_ use that
> construct without you eventually replacing it.

That's right.


        Stefan