Honestly, it didn't cross my mind to just use commands' full names,
probably due to some misplaced concern for efficiency. You're right,
though -- using command names would make it considerably easier to
read and configure. I'll convert it over first thing.
I've corrected most of the warnings thrown by checkdoc-current-buffer,
although "First line is not a complete sentence" is a little difficult
to pull off in 80 chars :) The updated code can still be found at
I should have matching on command names completed by tomorrow or the
next day.
So what's the next step? I'm willing to sign the copyright papers, of
course.
--tlh
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Stefan Monnier <
address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm working on a command suggestion minor mode. I just realized that this is
> also an item on the Emacs TODO list (C-h C-t), and that I should contact you
> about it on off chance that you want it, or have some suggestions about its
I'm not sure why you bother turning the commands into single-letter
chars, rather than just use their full name, but it looks interesting.
I think the most interesting part is the recs-cmd-regexps.
What do people think about this?
We could definitely add it to
elpa.gnu.org, but of course, this would
require you signing some copyright paperwork for it.
BTW, please try C-u M-x checkdoc-current-buffer a few times to fix some
minor coding convention details.
Stefan