[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google modules integration
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Google modules integration |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 03:42:40 +0200 |
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:36, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> wrote:
> (b) using the Maps APIs. In this case, you understand and agree that
> Google will treat your use of the Maps APIs as acceptance of the Terms
> from that point onwards.
IANAL, but it seems quite fishy. Assume you argue that you used the
APIs without reading that. Yeah, I know, ignorantia juris non excusat,
but that's not the law, that's a license agreement. So, what would be
your crime, "using an API without reading the license"? :-)
(What I mean is, has someone really tried to defend that kind of
license on a tribunal? Did it work?)
Juanma
- Google modules integration, Julien Danjou, 2010/09/09
- Re: Google modules integration, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/09
- Re: Google modules integration, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/09
- Re: Google modules integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/09/09
- Re: Google modules integration, Jambunathan K, 2010/09/09
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/10
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Google modules integration, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/09/11
- Re: Google modules integration, Jambunathan K, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Jeff Clough, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/13
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Glenn Morris, 2010/09/12
- Re: Google modules integration, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/13
- Re: Google modules integration, Jambunathan K, 2010/09/13