Re: Compiling Elisp to a native code with a GCC plugin

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Lars sounds like he would be better served with looking-at getting an
> optional "LITERAL" argument making it do its job without involving the
> regexp machinery.

Yes, a LITERAL option to `looking-at' would make sense.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen