Re: Compiling Elisp to a native code with a GCC plugin

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

> No, because of the gap issue.  That's why Fbuffer_substring moves the
> gap out of its way:
>
>   if (start < GPT && GPT < end)
>     move_gap (start);

Yeah, I do that to in at_literal().

The thing I'm must unclear on now is whether it's valid to say

int thing = PT;

and whether it's valid to say

PT + 1;

I've grepped through the code, and this seems to be used all over the
place, so I'm guessing that perhaps the size of a buffer is constrained
to be less than INT_MAX?  Even though PT is EMACS_INT.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen