[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e and pi
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: e and pi |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:43:39 +0200 |
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 03:10, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
> If function argument names are the problem, why not just give them
> static scope, overriding any existing dynamic bindings? While it's
> idiomatic elisp to use `let' to bind dynamic variables, AFAICT no one
> uses function arguments to do the same.
I don't have the Emacs source at hand and won't for a couple days, but
I'm sure there are a few places where default args to functions are
used to bind dynamic variables to (default) nil.
Juanma
- Re: e and pi, (continued)
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/18
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/19
- RE: e and pi, Drew Adams, 2010/09/17
- Re: e and pi, tomas, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, David Kastrup, 2010/09/18
- Re: e and pi, tomas, 2010/09/19
- Re: e and pi, Uday S Reddy, 2010/09/17
Re: e and pi, Sam Steingold, 2010/09/17