[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-d deleting region considered harmful
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: C-d deleting region considered harmful |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:44:45 -0700 |
> > No. Both <delete> and C-d, whether mapped together or not,
> > should do what they have always done in Emacs: delete the
> > next char. Whether the region is active or not.
>
> Thanks. But we're discussing here what to do with C-d:
Yes, we are. And I'm adding <delete> to the discussion, which is typically
mapped to C-d.
> for `delete' we already decided that it should delete an
> active region (by default).
I see. Where/when was that decided?
That's too bad. C-d and <delete> should just delete the next char.
> Whether you agree with this `delete' behavior is irrelevant.
Anything I say you might consider irrelevant, whether I agree or disagree with
you. That's your right. I still voice my agreement or disagreement.
Voicing disagreement to your decisions is often ineffectual in terms of getting
you to reconsider, it is true. That is not a reason to keep silent when a
choice is bad.
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Miles Bader, 2010/09/18
RE: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2010/09/18
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/19
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/19
RE: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Drew Adams, 2010/09/19
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Lennart Borgman, 2010/09/20
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Bastien, 2010/09/20
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/20
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Bastien, 2010/09/20
Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/20