[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with xml-parse-string
From: |
Edward O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with xml-parse-string |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:14:23 -0700 |
> This is not a bad idea in principle. But how "standardized" is SXML?
> It doesn't seem to be an official standard developed by W3 or other
> similar body. If it's an unofficial standard, well, we have our own
> unofficial standard---xml.el was released in 2000, and so predates SXML.
More importantly, there's a fair amount of elisp out there that
expects the structure xml.el puts out. If you ask me [which, of
course, you didn't :)] the libxml stuff should be made to output the
exact same structure as xml.el already does.
- Re: pcase.el, (continued)
- Re: pcase.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/09/28
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2010/09/24
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Kevin Rodgers, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Andy Wingo, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string,
Edward O'Connor <=
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Leo, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Chong Yidong, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Wojciech Meyer, 2010/09/22
- Re: Problems with xml-parse-string, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/22