Re: EMACS_INT cleanup

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> Lisp_Object
> oblookup (Lisp_Object obarray, register const char *ptr, int size, int 
> size_byte)
>
> The last parameter there is an EMACS_INT.  Should I change oblookup to
> take EMACS_INT parameters, in case we want to intern a 2.1GB long
> string? 

I mean, it sounds nonsensical, but 1) it makes it compile without any
other warnings, and 2) if you've said (setq a (buffer-string)) on a big
buffer and then happen to (intern a), you don't want a segfault, do you?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen