Re: Slow image display over network

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:

> That said, it has been alleged in the past that XEmacs instantiates
> images more quickly than Emacs does.  You might try benchmarking Emacs
> against XEmacs; if Emacs performs comparably to XEmacs, while there
> still may very well be a bug, it's probably pretty hard to fix since
> two rather different implementations are showing the same performance
> issue.

I've done some simple tests via ssh/X, and it seems that the XEmacs
image display is vaguely slower, but it's a bit difficult to time.
There's no huge difference, in any case.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen