[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: EMACS_INT cleanup |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:00:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> void
>> message3 (Lisp_Object m, int nbytes, int multibyte)
>>
>> So we can only do a message that's 2GB big? Well, OK, but is that a
>> problem?
>
> Why bother thinking? Why not just replace int with EMACS_INT?
I'm just querying the list about what they think the general policy for
this should be. I (personally) think all this should be fixed, so that
the gcc warnings would actually be useful, but since -Wall is in the
state it's in, I was assuming that there might be a reason for that
state.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, (continued)
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Miles Bader, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, David Kastrup, 2010/09/24
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/23
- Re: EMACS_INT cleanup, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/09/23