Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 94, Issue 89

[Stefan Monnier]

>> What would it be called?  XIINT?  Eek.  Uhm.  XNINT?  (For "not long
>> int.")  :-)  Ok, I have nothing.
> IXINT?

XINT would be the obvious name, but it's already taken.
IXINT doesn't follow the "X..." convention we've used so far, but
I won't oppose it.  We could go with XINT_int, otherwise.

Another question is whether it should do range-checking or just silent
wrap-around.


        Stefan