[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:26:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Deniz Dogan <address@hidden> writes:
> 2010/10/7 Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>:
>>
>> This was discussed briefly a few years ago and Stefan (and other
>> people) agreed with it: how about we map ibuffer to C-x C-b by default
>> in Emacs-24?
>>
>> ibuffer is a superset of list-buffers, and it provides many things
>> that list-buffers does not.
>>
>>
>
> If a significant majority of experienced Emacs users prefer to use
> ibuffer instead of list-buffers (which is what I believe) what is the
> problem with making this change?
Thinking like a suitor rather than a programmer.
Making a choice between two different feature sets that both have
deficiencies is the wrong thing to do if we can instead create a version
that does not contain the particular weaknesses of either.
A bit more of the Frankenstein spirit, if you please.
--
David Kastrup
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Juri Linkov, 2010/10/07
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, David Kastrup, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Deniz Dogan, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, David Kastrup, 2010/10/08
- Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Lennart Borgman, 2010/10/08
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, René Kyllingstad, 2010/10/08
Re: binding ibuffer to C-x C-b by default, Roland Winkler, 2010/10/08