|
From: | Angelo Graziosi |
Subject: | Re: Emacs bootstrap: 'ignored' errors [trunk] |
Date: | Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:41:32 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; it; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
Il 10/10/2010 0.21, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto:
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:06:56 +0200 From: Angelo Graziosi<address@hidden> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden Il 09/10/2010 23.51, Eli Zaretskii ha scritto:Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 22:58:43 +0200 From: Angelo Graziosi<address@hidden> Cc: Emacs<address@hidden> Il 09/10/2010 20.10, Glenn Morris ha scritto:Angelo Graziosi wrote:have you some comments?My comment on ignored make errors is that they should be ignored.No, as you have seen, 'errors' should never been ignored...??? Commands that begin with a "-" in the Makefile are written that way to ignore errors if they happen.The errors 'ignored'[1] were related to fatal errors which broke the bootstrap (out of tree) in rev.101874 [2].Errors that should be ignored by Make can never break any build.
I haven't said that they break the build.If I have understood, they were generated by the build out of tree (OOT). In rev.101874 there were similar changes (all in docs) *which* caused the break in the bootstrap OOT.
In some ways, the 'ignored' errors were the basis of the upcoming fatal ones. Perhaps, asking 'why I got these ignored?' could avoid the break in r101874: the recent changes in docs did not take into account for bootstrap OOT.
Ciao, Angelo.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |