[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `set-variable' should use :set
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: `set-variable' should use :set |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:48:15 +0900 |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>> However, it does not respect a defcustom :set. I'm thinking that it should,
>> so
>> that using `set-variable' would indeed be a proper shortcut for setting an
>> option value.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me....
BTW, my vague impression is that `set-variable' is pretty lightly used,
maybe because it's not that much more convenient than just "M-: (setq..."
Making this change might make it a much more useful command...
-Miles
--
Conservative, n. A statesman enamored of existing evils, as opposed to a
Liberal, who wants to replace them with new ones.
- `set-variable' should use :set, Drew Adams, 2010/10/21
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Miles Bader, 2010/10/21
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set,
Miles Bader <=
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Drew Adams, 2010/10/21
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/21
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Drew Adams, 2010/10/22
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, David Kastrup, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/22
- RE: `set-variable' should use :set, Drew Adams, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, David Kastrup, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/10/22
- Re: `set-variable' should use :set, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/23