[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: configure{.in,} question
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: configure{.in,} question |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:56:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> Big changes are expected if you use a different version of autoconf to
> the previous guy. I try to use the same version always to avoid this.
Hm. This line didn't change when I ran autoconf:
# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.65 for emacs 24.0.50.
So I guess it's the same thing.
>> ! if test x$GCC = xyes && test "x$GCC_LINK_TEST_OPTIONS" != x
>> ! then
>> ! ac_link="$ac_link $GCC_LINK_TEST_OPTIONS"
>> ! fi
>> !
>> ! if test x$GCC = x && test "x$NON_GCC_LINK_TEST_OPTIONS" != x
>> ! then
>> ! ac_link="$ac_link $NON_GCC_LINK_TEST_OPTIONS"
>> fi
>
> I did not bother regenerating configure for that change, since it
> purely cosmetic.
So... I should just commit this, even though this has nothing to do
with the change I was making in configure.in?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
- configure{.in,} question, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2010/10/24
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Glenn Morris, 2010/10/24
- Re: configure{.in,} question,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Glenn Morris, 2010/10/24
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/24
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Andreas Schwab, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Andreas Schwab, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Julien Danjou, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Andreas Schwab, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/10/25
- Re: configure{.in,} question, Stefan Monnier, 2010/10/25