[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: simple useful functions
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: simple useful functions |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:20:05 -0700 |
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:10:28 -0700: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Uh, what "replace" functionality does "collect-string" provide?
> >
> > I followed your logic as you insist associating this command to occur
> > which is defined in replace.el.
>
> Ah. "Irreconcilable technical differences" raise their heads once in
> again. In *my* (X)Emacs, occur is defined in occur.el, and that's the
> way it should be. :-)
Ah. That explains the mutual misunderstanding. I was wondering why.
-Tak
- Re: simple useful functions, Tak Ota, 2010/11/01
- Re: simple useful functions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/01
- Re: simple useful functions, Tak Ota, 2010/11/03
- Re: simple useful functions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/03
- Re: simple useful functions,
Tak Ota <=
- collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Tak Ota, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Tak Ota, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Tak Ota, 2010/11/04
- Re: collect-string (was: simple useful functions), Andreas Röhler, 2010/11/05
- Re: collect-string, Stefan Monnier, 2010/11/08
- Re: collect-string, Tak Ota, 2010/11/08
- Re: collect-string, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/11/09
- Re: collect-string, Tak Ota, 2010/11/09