Re: Type-error in C code

[Stefan Monnier]

>> I think we should remove the union Lisp_Object, and instead define a
>> struct Lisp_Object { EMACS_INT i; } (reusing the macros of the non-union
>> type), and make that the default Lisp_Object at least during
>> development.
> I can't think of a good reason not to do that. Is there one?

Data of type "struct ..." is often treated differently by compilers than
data of type int/long/... so the resulting code is likely to be
less efficient.


        Stefan