Re: Passing flags using vc-do-command

[Stefan Monnier]

>>> If not, what would be the best way to remedy the situation?
>> Don't use vc-do-command and use process-file or
>> start-file-process directly.
> That way, I would have to duplicate a considerable amount of the
> functionality of vc-do-command.

Another option is to pass nil for the file-or-list argument.

> What about adding a more versatile version of vc-do-command that
> accepts after-flags as well as before-flags and implement the current
> vc-do-command using that?  I could implement it and send in a patch.

That could work as well.


        Stefan