[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:15:39 -0500 |
The idea is that I could do "M-x
bod" and it would call the right version.
If you want `bod' to do something mode-specific, it is easy enough to
define a command `bod' that uses a variable to decide what to do.
Of course it would make no
sense for this particular case, but in general instead of making long,
hard to remember key bindings for less frequently used commands you
could use M-x with an easier to remember mnemonic.
You could define them as aliases yourself, too.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, (continued)
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/09
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Davis Herring, 2011/03/09
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/11
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/11
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Scott Frazer, 2011/03/11
- Re: Per-mode obarray for M-x, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/03/11