Re: more url-utils?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

address@hidden writes:

> Would the defun below be suitable to include in url-util?
> You nearly always want to work with the data part of the document.

Perhaps binding something like `url-return-data-only', and then having
url-retrieve strip the headers before returning the buffer would be
nice.

My guess is that more than 90% of the users of `url-retrieve' don't care
about the headers, so having it do the stripping would be convenient.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/