[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Pretest begins end-June
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Pretest begins end-June |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 08:25:50 -0700 |
> > (let ((pop-up-frames t)) (pop-to-buffer buffer))
>
> The part I don't understand is why we can't preserve backward
> compatibility for such code.
It is not just, or even most importantly, about backward compatibility. Being
able to determine/regulate the behavior with a dynamic binding is an important
feature. This change would apparently remove/limit that possibility.
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/02
- RE: Pretest begins end-June,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/01
- RE: Pretest begins end-June, Drew Adams, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/01
- RE: Pretest begins end-June, Drew Adams, 2011/06/01
- Re: Pretest begins end-June, martin rudalics, 2011/06/02
window-safely-shrinkable-p [was Re: Pretest begins end-June], Glenn Morris, 2011/06/11