[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extra-interactive functions
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: extra-interactive functions |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:54:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> mr> Such functions should be in `byte-compile-interactive-only-functions'.
>
> Oh cool, so it already exists :) Can the docstring for those functions
> automatically include a warning about usage from ELisp?
I suppose that anyone adding a function to that list should take care of
fixing the doc-string appropriately.
> Since you're so
> careful about including functions in that list,
Am I?
> it makes sense to use it
> authoritatively.
IMHO the warnings are sufficiently annyoing during compilation. Just
the authors don't seem very annoyed ;-)
martin
- Re: ERT indentation testing, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/01
- Re: ERT indentation testing, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/02
- Re: ERT indentation testing, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/02
- Re: ERT indentation testing, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/03
- Re: ERT indentation testing, martin rudalics, 2011/06/03
- extra-interactive functions (was: ERT indentation testing), Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/03
- Re: extra-interactive functions, martin rudalics, 2011/06/03
- Re: extra-interactive functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/03
- Re: extra-interactive functions, martin rudalics, 2011/06/03
- Re: extra-interactive functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/03
- Re: extra-interactive functions,
martin rudalics <=
Re: ERT indentation testing, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/08