[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: debbugs.el revisited
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: debbugs.el revisited |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jul 2011 12:48:37 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> The version number is the version number the fix has been applied to?
>> Then perhaps it could just default to sending over
>>
>> emacs-version
>> => "24.0.50.6"
>>
>> if the user doesn't override it?
>
> I think that's a bad idea. The right number to use in that case would be
> "24.1", ie the first _release_ in which something is fixed. "24.0.50.6",
> or even "24.0.50" is a meaningless version number.
It can be useful during pretesting to have the pretest version number in
there, so users can know whether a bug is supposed to be fixed in the
current pretest version or the next one. But the .50 version number is
not useful, as it does not change over a long period.
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, (continued)
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, joakim, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Stefan Monnier, 2011/07/04
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Christoph Scholtes, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Michael Albinus, 2011/07/03
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Glenn Morris, 2011/07/02
- Re: debbugs.el revisited,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Andreas Schwab, 2011/07/03
- Re: debbugs.el revisited, Michael Albinus, 2011/07/02