Re: Policy for backwards-incompatible changes?

[Chong Yidong]

Dave Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:

>> (The `custom-enabled-themes' variable itself would have to be treated
>> specially, of course, but that's also the case currently; you can set
>> it from a theme.)
>>
>> The commands like `load-theme', if called interactively, could prompt
>> for whether or not to override the `user' theme.
>
> So it sounds like you would be open to accepting a patch that would
> implement this?

Yes, if you are willing to write a patch for that, I can certainly take
a look at it.  OTOH it should go into 24.2 rather than 24.1, but that
depends on how invasive the change turns out to be.