[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows' "split status"
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Windows' "split status" |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:34:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> Also I think `window-splits' is a bad name too. It's vague
> and provides no hint of its purpose. Would it be possible
> to find a better name that mentions `combination'? Such as e.g.
> `window-combination-resize' or `window-combination-balance'?
The term "balance" would be misleading since `balance-windows' and
`balance-windows-area' both try to give windows the same size which
`window-splits' doesn't. It rather causes windows get resized
proportionally. So I changed this to `window-combination-resize'.
Thanks, martin
- Re: Windows' "split status", (continued)
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/25
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/15
- Re: Windows' "split status", Chong Yidong, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", martin rudalics, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status", Juri Linkov, 2011/11/16
- Re: Windows' "split status",
martin rudalics <=