[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:37:00 +0100 |
2012/1/3 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>:
> I'm not sure what you and Juanma want to say. That because we don't
> have salaried positions for tracking GnuTLS updates to Emacs, it's a
> burden? Or that we shouldn't even do it? Or that we need more people
> to run the Emacs infrastructure? What's the problem and how can we
> solve it?
What I want to say is that is a problem already fixed elsewhere, and I
see no point in diverting resources to fix it again poorly.
> It certainly is easier for us, the developers. But I think it's not the
> best solution we can offer to the users.
The best thing we can offer to the users is invest our resources in
developing Emacs, not packaging what does not really need to be
packaged.
Juanma
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, joakim, 2012/01/04