[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:30:35 +0200 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:39:27 +0100
>
> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > It can work, with a lot of fiddling, but is unreliable and causes many
> > issues that are hard to replicate, timeouts especially. I don't know of
> > anyone happily using it on W32 and think disabling it on W32 is a good
> > choice.
>
> If it can work, isn't there a way to make it work reliably? Where does
> it fail, usually?
>
> But if this is the case, I can add a test like
>
> (memq system-type '(windows-nt ms-dos))
>
> to `starttls-available-p'... Opinions?
Looks right to me, thanks.
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, (continued)
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05