[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS for W32
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS for W32 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:58:45 -0500 |
> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:04:56 -0800
> From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
> CC: Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
>
> > Conclusions based on experiences from Windows 2000 should be tossed as
> > irrelevant nowadays. Citing this is a good "war story", but has no
> > bearing on design decisions for future features.
>
> It underscores a general principle: ship applications as
> self-contained units that don't try to muck with the rest of the
> system.
I agree.
> > So let's forget about Windows 2000; it's irrelevant for this thread,
> > if not for any other thread.
>
> So we can, in fact, ditch ANSI support and use UNICODE everywhere?
Unicode is not about Windows 2000; and I did say "for this thread".
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, (continued)
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Daniel Colascione, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/01/05
- Re: GnuTLS for W32, chad, 2012/01/05