[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated]
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated] |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:13:33 +0900 |
Andreas Schwab writes:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Paul Eggert writes:
> > > We could use some other combinations, e.g., %< and %>
> > > (they kinda look like French quote marks). It's possible
> > > to support both,
> >
> > You're getting carried away. No thank you to multiple ways to do
> > something that's purely cosmetic.
>
> That's actually what GCC is using.
GCC is using *both* %` to supply mirrored quotes *and* %<, %> to
supply individual quotes? If so, -1 to GCC, too.
- Re: quotation marks, (continued)
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], James Cloos, 2012/01/20
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Stefan Monnier, 2012/01/20
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Paul Eggert, 2012/01/20
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/20
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Paul Eggert, 2012/01/20
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/21
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/21
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated],
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Tom Tromey, 2012/01/21
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/21
- Re: quotation marks [was Re: TUTORIAL.de updated], Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/21
Re: TUTORIAL.de updated, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/01/19