[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CL package serious deficiencies
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: CL package serious deficiencies |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 22:08:41 +0100 |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:06, Nix <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 7 Feb 2012, Lennart Borgman verbalised:
>
>> There are things that do not work if you include cl.el at run time.
>> You may not notice the problems and tracking it down has been quite
>> difficult some times.
>
> If so, these are either bugs in cl.el, or bugs in the conflicting
> packages, and should surely be fixed, rather than simply trying to avoid
> using cl.
Fixing the bugs would be better yes. Anyone interested can do that.
But no one has said that cl.el should not be used. I have not seen any
problems when the instructions for its use are followed.
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, (continued)
- RE: CL package serious deficiencies, egnarts-ms, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Glenn Morris, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Daniel Colascione, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Nix, 2012/02/07
- Re: CL package serious deficiencies, Tom Tromey, 2012/02/07