[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows 64 port
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Windows 64 port |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:58:03 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:43:34 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> CC: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, AJMR <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
>
> Ideally any changes for Windows 64 would be only to the
> Windows-specific part of the code, so that we don't need to worry
> about its effect on GNU hosts.
gmalloc.c and ralloc.c must be exceptions from this rule, for obvious
reasons. (Though the 64-bit Windows build probably is, or will be,
the only 64-bit platform to use these two.)
I'd also take a very good look at all the EMACS_UINT uses, and a few
`long's and `unsigned long's in regex.c.
- Windows 64 port, AJMR, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/19
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/20
- Re: Windows 64 port, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/21
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/02/22
- Re: Windows 64 port, Richard Stallman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Aurélien, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Lennart Borgman, 2012/02/23
- Re: Windows 64 port, Fabrice Popineau, 2012/02/23