[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CL package suggestion

From: Ilya Shlyakhter
Subject: Re: CL package suggestion
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:56:31 -0400

Agree about cl- being better than ecl- .

Btw, if remove-if becomes defalias'ed to cl-remove-if, aren't the two calls indistinguishable
to the byte compiler?   If they are, and calling cl-remove wouldn't trigger a warning,
wouldn't remove-if calls also become warning-less?   And if they would, isn't it simpler
to just allow calling remove-if? :)


On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm just glad this is being considered :)  It'd be great to see this in
> 24.2 .

Patch welcome (and BTW, I'd prefer the "cl-" prefix over the "ecl-" prefix).
It's never too early to start.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]