[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: auth.texi (was: Release branch plans)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: auth.texi (was: Release branch plans) |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:23:53 +0300 |
> From: Michael Albinus <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:18:33 +0200
>
> No problem. Just a question; You have changed the collection names
> from @samp{"default"} to @samp{default}. I have used the apostrophes in
> order to show that the names are strings, as done for example in the
> doc/lispref/* files. I believe we shall keep this (but maybe @code{"default"}
> would be more appropriate).
Indeed, @code is more appropriate here, as it won't add an extra pair
of single quotes around the string in the printed version of the
manual.
- Re: GnuTLS docs, (continued)
Re: Release branch plans, Michael Albinus, 2012/04/02
Re: Release branch plans, Michael Albinus, 2012/04/04
Re: Release branch plans, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/04/05
auth.texi (was: Release branch plans), Michael Albinus, 2012/04/05
Re: auth.texi (was: Release branch plans),
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: auth.texi, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/04/05
Re: Release branch plans, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/02
Re: Release branch plans, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/02
Re: Release branch plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/02