[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and Guile
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and Guile |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:06:42 -0400 |
What Guile 2.0 needs (especially for a realistic shot at Emacs
integration), is for Someone apart from the primary Guile hackers
to curate the 1.8 branch, applying bugfixes, doc upgrades, and
design shims, all to increase the sense of continuity perceived
by client code.
I agree it would be good if Guile worked on non-GNU systems.
At the same time, we should be careful not to define support
for non-GNU systems as part of our primary goal.
That would be drifting in the direction of downgrading our real goal.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/
- Re: Emacs and Guile, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and Guile, BT Templeton, 2012/04/10
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- RE: Emacs and Guile, Drew Adams, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile, BT Templeton, 2012/04/11
- RE: Emacs and Guile, Drew Adams, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/04/13
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Miles Bader, 2012/04/13
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2012/04/22
- Re: Emacs and Guile, Andy Wingo, 2012/04/11
- Re: Emacs and Guile (was: GSoC projects related to Emacs), Ken Raeburn, 2012/04/12