[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:28:59 +0900 |
Steve Yegge <address@hidden> writes:
> * it's Lispy. Yes, most Lisp dialects got strings wrong, but that
> shouldn't stop us. Strings are just character sequences, and whether
> you like it or not, the nil/empty-list equivalence is part of Emacs's
> soul. Throwing an error on a nil string is a radical departure from
> the core philosophy.
That's a pretty dubious claim...
-miles
--
A zen-buddhist walked into a pizza shop and
said, "Make me one with everything."
- proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Steve Yegge, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Karl Fogel, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Helmut Eller, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Stefan Monnier, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Miles Bader, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/25
- Re: proposal to make null string handling more emacs-y, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/04/25