Re: inline build_string performance

[Paul Eggert]

On 06/26/2012 10:33 AM, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> This may be implemented without reverting previous stuff.

Sure, but if we we use build_literal for literals, and
build_string for non-literals, there's a performance
downside for having build_string be inline (namely,
it bloats the code), but no performance upside.

Perhaps I'm not quite following your idea, as
I thought the signature would be build_literal ("foo"),
whereas your build_literal also wants the string length.