[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extra info about 109170
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Extra info about 109170 |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:32:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I simply don't think we should pay attention to kill-buffer here. It
> takes only 12% of the run time in this case, and is not an important
> operation in general to invest efforts in speeding it up.
To me, this optimization is a "low hanging fruit", which gives you 8% of
speed up for little effort. I don't know of many such optimizations.
Stefan
- Re: Extra info about 109170, (continued)
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/22
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, joakim, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Nix, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/23
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Stefan Monnier, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/07/24
- Re: Extra info about 109170,
Stefan Monnier <=