[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:35:07 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:58:10 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> On 08/24/2012 06:38 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > I wonder if there is a gdb deficiency we can easily address.
>
> I looked into this and it turns out that it can be addressed,
> on the platforms that support "gcc -g3". -g3 is not the default,
> which means random Emacs builds are unlikely to work with GDB and
> macros.
FWIW, I always wondered why we don't use "-ggdb -g3" by default, when
GCC is the compiler.
- Re: C backtraces for Emacs, (continued)
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Andreas Schwab, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/22
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Tom Tromey, 2012/08/25
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Stefan Monnier, 2012/08/24
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Paul Eggert, 2012/08/26
- Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/08/22
Re: inlinable functions instead of macros, Richard Stallman, 2012/08/18