[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET merge
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET merge |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Oct 2012 19:31:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
David Engster wrote:
> There are still some packages which are only in CEDET upstream for
> several reasons: They're either pretty new and not well tested, or are
> in our 'contrib' directory and don't have proper papers, or because they
> are a bit obscure (sorry Eric ;-) ) and well separated and hence would
> better fit into ELPA.
Is there a reason why Emacs does not have the srecode manual?
http://debbugs.gnu.org9966
- Re: CEDET merge, (continued)
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/04
- Re: CEDET merge, Chong Yidong, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, Chong Yidong, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/07
- Re: CEDET merge,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: CEDET merge, Glenn Morris, 2012/10/06
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/07
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/27
- Re: CEDET merge, Glenn Morris, 2012/10/28
- Re: CEDET merge, David Engster, 2012/10/07