[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:09:19 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:28:14 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> #1 0x005bf093 in emacs_abort () at w32fns.c:7706
> button = 6
> #2 0x00536928 in staticpro (varaddress=0x807c8c) at alloc.c:5033
> No locals.
This just means NSTATIC should be bumped up again (which Daniel
already did, I see).
I think going from 0x650 to 0x1000 is too much. But I'll let Stefan
decide.
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, (continued)
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Daniel Colascione, 2012/10/15
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/16
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/16
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/10/17
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/17
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/10/17
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Nix, 2012/10/17
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Daniel Colascione, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Stefan Monnier, 2012/10/18
- Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/19
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Angelo Graziosi, 2012/10/19
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Angelo Graziosi, 2012/10/20
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/20
Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?, Ken Brown, 2012/10/20