[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU ELPA visibility
From: |
Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU ELPA visibility |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:47:29 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> I.e. we need to replace the READMEs with more structured files which
>>> can be easily turned into acceptable HTML (no need to be fancy, here)
>>> as well as easy to render acceptably in Emacs (extra bonus points if
>>> that same format can end up being used as a replacement for Info ;-).
>> Org can be exported to HTML, Plain text (ASCII) and texi.
>
> So far, Org, ReST, Markdown, and Texinfo sound like the best
> options, indeed.
I think you might as well support several formats, to cover the existing
README files.
That would complicate showing these files in the package.el interface in
a fancy way, but I think that's a reasonable tradeoff.
At least two of the above formats look quite reasonably in plain text.
- Re: GNU ELPA visibility,
Dmitry Gutov <=